The reference being*, radio.
[Really Now ** ! ? ]
*Stephanie Miller
[Ed Schultz, Thom Hartmann, Norman Goldman]
** not exactly*** !
*** 5-3-13 (5-2-13) Hardball (Scorched Earth), Politics Nation(GOP vs TP, Blockbuster)
Showing posts with label Stephanie Miller. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Stephanie Miller. Show all posts
Thursday, May 02, 2013
Wednesday, December 19, 2012
CBS AM 1090 Seattle: Get it while you can.
CBS drops talk for sports.
[CBS's AM1090 Converting to Sports Talk]**
This very disappointing** news came to me via the Norman Goldman Show.
Others who will need relocation:
* Randi Rhodes(6-9pm)
Mike Malloy(9pm-12am)
Stephanie Miller(6-9am)
Thom Hartmann(9am-12pm) KBCS(91.3)FM
Ed Schultz(12-3pm)
*(presented in order from time of this news)
(Norman is 3-6pm)
**[12-20-12(dual use asterisk/edit)sadness, panic, (add)embarrassment to have missed it. But nail' d, This.]
[CBS's AM1090 Converting to Sports Talk]**
This very disappointing** news came to me via the Norman Goldman Show.
Others who will need relocation:
* Randi Rhodes(6-9pm)
Mike Malloy(9pm-12am)
Stephanie Miller(6-9am)
Thom Hartmann(9am-12pm) KBCS(91.3)FM
Ed Schultz(12-3pm)
*(presented in order from time of this news)
(Norman is 3-6pm)
**[12-20-12(dual use asterisk/edit)sadness, panic, (add)embarrassment to have missed it. But nail' d, This.]
Tuesday, July 10, 2012
Two Wrongs Make a Right?
Romney would rather have the discussion be, him as a victim of class warf**are, than discussing the choice between his (Ryan/Bane or Priebus/Gitmo) economy and the Obama Economy.
(Trigger? Hardball!)
(Out-sourcing/Off shoring? That's the ticket or GitMo.)
(Kill*** the Strategy: More Politics ofor* the Table.)
* [!] not quite over(Water Sport anyone)
[7-11-12 All links added today.]
[Not sure about the Hardball. Is that the ticket?]
**A mitt-insert, structural typo, or metaphorical evolution of warf-are.
*** Skirting the poly ticks.(Holder v. Hold-up)
[Not that out-sourcing or off-shoring are wrong, but man up ...] *iv
P.S. (Pre-Selection: Romney/Ryan 2012)
(Trigger? Hardball!)
(Out-sourcing/Off shoring? That's the ticket or GitMo.)
(Kill*** the Strategy: More Politics ofor* the Table.)
* [!] not quite over(Water Sport anyone)
[7-11-12 All links added today.]
[Not sure about the Hardball. Is that the ticket?]
**A mitt-insert, structural typo, or metaphorical evolution of warf-are.
*** Skirting the poly ticks.(Holder v. Hold-up)
[Not that out-sourcing or off-shoring are wrong, but man up ...] *iv
Monday, May 07, 2012
First Sources
It is a beautiful Monday, Stephanie Miller is on the radio. France attempts a turn from austerity.^^
[Really... Click on in"F"ables(see**) at your own risk.]
Guest Eric Boehler of Media Matters and other* in"F"ables.**
President Obama takes his gloves off*** and Ron Paul is another matter.
Not[!][?]
*killing 2brds with one asterisk (the "other" link has nothing to do with Stephanie Miller)
But the next link is not for the Right thinking.
** More than you might want to hear by LiveFree Funny or Die.
Scroll over for insufficient warning.
*** First Read (two videos) Framing 2012
Note [?] @Not[!] = Churned Media
[Winning? Backward? Mitt-Flop ? (see two videos ***)]
[Not^ the bottom line! (see comments/hints)NFRY]
^confidence fairies ?
[Not such a large leap?!] Knot! Really it is.
^^ L8 link
Update: 5-8-12 Martin Bashir
Ed Schultz on Mitt Flop [!][?] Really! Really? And Lastly.
5-9-12 Charles Johnson
One person's Mitt-Flop ~ is another's Physics~ of Nuance.
~ Duality / Noncausality
[Really... Click on in"F"ables(see**) at your own risk.]
Guest Eric Boehler of Media Matters and other* in"F"ables.**
President Obama takes his gloves off*** and Ron Paul is another matter.
Not[!][?]
*killing 2brds with one asterisk (the "other" link has nothing to do with Stephanie Miller)
But the next link is not for the Right thinking.
** More than you might want to hear by Live
Scroll over for insufficient warning.
*** First Read (two videos) Framing 2012
Note [?] @Not[!] = Churned Media
[Winning? Backward? Mitt-Flop ? (see two videos ***)]
[Not^ the bottom line! (see comments/hints)NFRY]
^confidence fairies ?
^^ L8 link
Update: 5-8-12 Martin Bashir
Ed Schultz on Mitt Flop [!][?] Really! Really? And Lastly.
5-9-12 Charles Johnson
One person's Mitt-Flop ~ is another's Physics~ of Nuance.
~ Duality / Noncausality
Monday, February 27, 2012
Thursday, March 10, 2011
Today is a good day for...
...STEPHANIE MILLER.
Something about having to laugh or you'd (might) cry. I had a hunch this would start something, or end somewhere.
Speaking of Ribbles...
Multiple "Choice" Questions
The Fourth Law of Logic
Something to Ponder
Math is next to Ge Oh Me Try.
God is Good[*]with a missing Oh.
Actually this was a tangent from my original intent.(NOT) (or pond during)
But seriously(as if I am not): there were also three links from Stephanie Miller.(not to mention)
[* 3-11-11] today I note that at the time I was aware of the irony or maybe the need for a comma, or was it too vain an attempt, as an "o" really is needed to have the "oh", yet it revolves around "Something to Ponder".
Something about having to laugh or you'd (might) cry. I had a hunch this would start something, or end somewhere.
Speaking of Ribbles...
Multiple "Choice" Questions
The Fourth Law of Logic
Something to Ponder
Math is next to Ge Oh Me Try.
God is Good[*]with a missing Oh.
Actually this was a tangent from my original intent.(NOT) (or pond during)
But seriously(as if I am not): there were also three links from Stephanie Miller.(not to mention)
[* 3-11-11] today I note that at the time I was aware of the irony or maybe the need for a comma, or was it too vain an attempt, as an "o" really is needed to have the "oh", yet it revolves around "Something to Ponder".
Tuesday, July 27, 2010
Avian Update
Chicken Hawk Up.
Media Matters Alert!
Republican Trillions in Error*.
Not one for slow blogging or even reading...mean flighty links and flash blogging.***
[ASTE(R)ISK IV: TO READ(usually a self-admonition or pun)but see below between * & ** and note that the long term errors could be flip-flopped as4 investment turn around i.e Refudiate d Economics. Update under(over) construction.]
QCON: Stephanie** Miller
Conservative claim submitted that Sherrod leak was an Obama distraction from all of Obama's problems. My earlier thought was that it was a distraction from all his successes. In fact, my idea is supported by the fact that Breitbart had this for months.(by one account, accuracy aside) Camel's nose under tent? It occurred to me re: Tax increase verses Expiring Cuts. This means that Republicans are the camel's nose, when they now want to extend cuts scheduled to expire. On the other hump, Democrats will extend the middle class tax cuts. Not to mention one of these could actually pay for the other.[McClatchy]
* Trillions in error: based on 500 billion in 2020 alone
[Not to mention "tax on uncertainty" of small businesses being so impacted: If they hire more, they will be taxed less, and profit more.]
** Obama takes on GOP "shadow groups" and hails DISCLOSE act.
[***] see Deficit Pidgeons? non update ***.
Media Matters Alert!
Republican Trillions in Error*.
Not one for slow blogging or even reading...mean flighty links and flash blogging.***
[ASTE(R)ISK IV: TO READ(usually a self-admonition or pun)but see below between * & ** and note that the long term errors could be flip-flopped as4 investment turn around i.e Refudiate d Economics. Update under(over) construction.]
QCON: Stephanie** Miller
Conservative claim submitted that Sherrod leak was an Obama distraction from all of Obama's problems. My earlier thought was that it was a distraction from all his successes. In fact, my idea is supported by the fact that Breitbart had this for months.(by one account, accuracy aside) Camel's nose under tent? It occurred to me re: Tax increase verses Expiring Cuts. This means that Republicans are the camel's nose, when they now want to extend cuts scheduled to expire. On the other hump, Democrats will extend the middle class tax cuts. Not to mention one of these could actually pay for the other.[McClatchy]
* Trillions in error: based on 500 billion in 2020 alone
[Not to mention "tax on uncertainty" of small businesses being so impacted: If they hire more, they will be taxed less, and profit more.]
** Obama takes on GOP "shadow groups" and hails DISCLOSE act.
[***] see Deficit Pidgeons? non update ***.
Thursday, April 15, 2010
R not, R2, R not, R2, R2, R not.
Are Democrats taking bipartisanship off the table?
Thanks to Stephanie Miller:
Austin Goolsby BTW: Not recovery-dot-com but maybe commerce.gov?
Timothy Geithner
Huffington Post.
[Earlier thank you, Rachel Maddow . Also... you can't handle the truth!]*
* wikispoiler? who gets it [**]in the end?
[** Obama Won(R2D2), Go for it, Get Over it, Toy Story. Punchline: Who writes your stuff.]
Thanks to Stephanie Miller:
Austin Goolsby BTW: Not recovery-dot-com but maybe commerce.gov?
Timothy Geithner
Huffington Post.
[Earlier thank you, Rachel Maddow . Also... you can't handle the truth!]*
* wikispoiler? who gets it [**]in the end?
[** Obama Won(R2D2), Go for it, Get Over it, Toy Story. Punchline: Who writes your stuff.]
Monday, March 16, 2009
Update: "Off The Cliff"
Maybe we are on a ledge now.
But a few things are clearer including fundamentals, except where what Obama said is anything like what McCain said.
[BONUS UPDATE[*]: Organizing For America And More]
In that vein (of the lead update) I append this economic perspective:
And throw out this idea to be reality checked:
a cap in the derivative process.
It seems that the real problem in the financial crisis was the packaging of investments (derivatives) that made them an increasing gamble and risk and further blew up the bubble. This may have already been addressed with new regulation and management, I am not sure. (It still seems a potential for ponzi or pyramid scheme, which furthers government interdependence. But with a clearer understanding of the Cap and Trade for Carbon emissions, maybe this could work for other issues and would have an impacted in guiding our values back to people rather than profits and away from a reliance on blowing things.
While this may be an example of too creative thinking, and too similar to the way I began this dialogue, I hope someone can grasp any threads which they might pull or weave for us. On the other hand a particular part of the Reich piece points to my need for better understanding of an impact. In the area of education reform and Obamanomics: "It cuts subsidies to banks participating in the student-loan program, which is exactly what Bill Clinton did, and it provides some funds for early childhood education." But I guess this just demonstrates the bottom up and balanced approach that in the context of the college tax credits and pell grant increases are necessary. (therefore not "on the other hand")
For a short allegory (enticing heading aside) on how we are all in this together, I just updated:(see ledge now: under construction) (3-18-09)
Since I have possibly dispelled my own concern regarding the one possible glitch in Obamanomics, I leave with another to dispel or verify. How is it that there can be a concern for imagined trickle-down opportunity being dashed by taxes, when business expenses are not really on the table? Food for thought? Or the recycler?
P.S. For a more deeply embedded compendium of sorts, where I picked on Chris Matthews (In an aside) and picked up on Jon Stewart(FNBC). And as far a fundamentals of McCain and Obama it is in the media that the difference lies as much as earmarks when it comes to comparing apples and oranges or pork and ham where we have a rotisserie of meaning and values and what is being skewered or brings stock aid to mind.
[And this addendum: Go Stephanie Miller! Thanks for being on CNN to balance Tucker'd out. And it is more than just funny, but that I have only stumbled on this now, and it is deeper and more on message than just video or Unsatire as the world evolves.]
[*] CORRECTION: These are not bonus links. At least the first is right on target at the fundamental difference: focus, fix and the press.
[Update 3-20-09: I never really did read Off The Cliff but used it as an allegorical leap, but here is a good point which it may have taken me some time to get to in the link I had.]
But a few things are clearer including fundamentals, except where what Obama said is anything like what McCain said.
[BONUS UPDATE[*]: Organizing For America And More]
In that vein (of the lead update) I append this economic perspective:
And throw out this idea to be reality checked:
a cap in the derivative process.
It seems that the real problem in the financial crisis was the packaging of investments (derivatives) that made them an increasing gamble and risk and further blew up the bubble. This may have already been addressed with new regulation and management, I am not sure. (It still seems a potential for ponzi or pyramid scheme, which furthers government interdependence. But with a clearer understanding of the Cap and Trade for Carbon emissions, maybe this could work for other issues and would have an impacted in guiding our values back to people rather than profits and away from a reliance on blowing things.
While this may be an example of too creative thinking, and too similar to the way I began this dialogue, I hope someone can grasp any threads which they might pull or weave for us. On the other hand a particular part of the Reich piece points to my need for better understanding of an impact. In the area of education reform and Obamanomics: "It cuts subsidies to banks participating in the student-loan program, which is exactly what Bill Clinton did, and it provides some funds for early childhood education." But I guess this just demonstrates the bottom up and balanced approach that in the context of the college tax credits and pell grant increases are necessary. (therefore not "on the other hand")
For a short allegory (enticing heading aside) on how we are all in this together, I just updated:(see ledge now: under construction) (3-18-09)
Since I have possibly dispelled my own concern regarding the one possible glitch in Obamanomics, I leave with another to dispel or verify. How is it that there can be a concern for imagined trickle-down opportunity being dashed by taxes, when business expenses are not really on the table? Food for thought? Or the recycler?
P.S. For a more deeply embedded compendium of sorts, where I picked on Chris Matthews (In an aside) and picked up on Jon Stewart(FNBC). And as far a fundamentals of McCain and Obama it is in the media that the difference lies as much as earmarks when it comes to comparing apples and oranges or pork and ham where we have a rotisserie of meaning and values and what is being skewered or brings stock aid to mind.
[And this addendum: Go Stephanie Miller! Thanks for being on CNN to balance Tucker'd out. And it is more than just funny, but that I have only stumbled on this now, and it is deeper and more on message than just video or Unsatire as the world evolves.]
[*] CORRECTION: These are not bonus links. At least the first is right on target at the fundamental difference: focus, fix and the press.
[Update 3-20-09: I never really did read Off The Cliff but used it as an allegorical leap, but here is a good point which it may have taken me some time to get to in the link I had.]
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)